Virtual and augmented reality as tools for cultural reconstruction

Download article
Article

Virtual and augmented reality as tools for cultural reconstruction

Ilze Eklsa

Received 16.06.2025, Revised 27.10.2025, Accepted 09.12.2025

https://doi.org/10.67524/verus5/1.2025.16

Retrieved from Vol. 1, No. 1, 2025

Pages 16-27

Abstract

The aim of the study was to explore the possibilities of virtual and augmented reality technologies for the reconstruction of cultural heritage and their integration into educational practices. The study employed a comparative and cognitive-cultural approach to analyse digital projects in three areas: reconstruction of lost monuments, museum practices, and educational applications. The methodology focused on examining sources of three-dimensional modelling, methods of integration into virtual environments, and the functional use of digital platforms across different national contexts. The results of the study demonstrated that virtual and augmented reality technologies provided new opportunities for the preservation and transmission of cultural heritage. They enabled the creation of highly detailed digital copies of architectural and cultural monuments, ensuring their long-term archiving and scientific interpretation. The Palmyra reconstruction project and the Virtual Museum of the Kyiv-Mohyla Academy confirmed the effectiveness of these tools in documenting war damage and safeguarding heritage. At the same time, the “Reborn Rome” initiative revealed the potential of reconstructing entire historical environments, highlighting their value for educational purposes. The analysis of museum practices at the Louvre and the British Museum showed transformations in the ways of presenting and experiencing works of art, while case studies from the United States, Japan, and Ukraine demonstrated that immersion in virtual environments improved learning outcomes and contributed to the development of innovative educational models. The results can be applied by museums, cultural institutions, and educational organisations to preserve heritage digitally and enhance learning through immersive technologies

References
  1. Alkhatib, Y.J., Forte, A., Bitelli, G., Pierdicca, R., & Malinverni, E. (2023). Bringing back lost heritage into life by 3D reconstruction in metaverse and virtual environments: The case study of Palmyra, Syria. In International conference on extended reality (pp. 91-106). Cham: Springer Nature Switzerland. doi: 10.1007/978-3-031-43404-4_7.
  2. Artificial Intelligence Laboratory. (n.d.). Retrieved from https://www.ai.iit.tsukuba.ac.jp/.
  3. Barrile, V., Bernardo, E., Fotia, A., & Bilotta, G. (2022). A combined study of cultural heritage in archaeological museums: 3D survey and mixed reality. Heritage, 5(3), 1330-1349. doi: 10.3390/heritage5030069.
  4. Boboc, R.G., Băutu, E., Gîrbacia, F., Popovici, N., & Popovici, D.M. (2022). Augmented reality in cultural heritage: An overview of the last decade of applications. Applied Sciences, 12(19), article number 9859. doi: 10.3390/app12199859.
  5. British Museum. (n.d.). Retrieved from https://www.britishmuseum.org/.
  6. Dieb, R., Alsalloum, A., & Webb, N. (2024). Interactive 360° media for the dissemination of endangered world heritage sites: The ancient city of Palmyra in Syria. Built Heritage, 8(1), article number 18. doi: 10.1186/s43238-024-00126-3.
  7. Fasolo, M. (2024). Rome Reborn 4.0: A virtual tour into the heart of the Eternal City. Archeomatica, 15(1), 14-26.
  8. Frischer, B., & Massey, D. (2022). 3D urban models as tools for research and discovery. In Critical archaeology in the digital age: Proceedings of the 12th IEMA visiting scholar’s conference (Vol. 2, p. 23). Los Angeles: Cotsen Institute of Archaeology Press.
  9. Google Arts & Culture. (n.d.). Retrieved from https://surl.li/wqiuji.
  10. Hutson, J., & Olsen, T. (2022). Virtual reality and art history: A case study of digital humanities and immersive learning environments. Journal of Higher Education Theory and Practice, 22(2), 50-65. doi: 10.33423/jhetp.v22i2.5036.
  11. Ivanysko, S., Kazakevych, G., & Shydlovskyi, P. (2024). Cultural heritage in the Russo-Ukrainian war: A victim in the conflict. Complutum, 35(1), 191-214. doi: 10.5209/cmpl.95930.
  12. Kennedy, A.A., Thacker, I., Nye, B.D., Sinatra, G.M., Swartout, W., & Lindsey, E. (2021). Promoting interest, positive emotions, and knowledge using augmented reality in a museum setting. International Journal of Science Education, Part B, 11(3), 242-258. doi: 10.1080/21548455.2021.1946619.
  13. Kleftodimos, A., & Evagelou, A. (2025). Location-based augmented reality in education. Encyclopedia, 5(2), article number 54. doi: 10.3390/encyclopedia5020054.
  14. Li, H., & Hiromu, I. (2021). Comparative analysis of information tendency and application features for projection mapping technologies at cultural heritage sites. Heritage Science, 9(1), article number 126. doi: 10.1186/s40494-021-00579-0.
  15. Lviv’s Heritage in 3D. (n.d.). Retrieved from https://www.uois.lviv.ua/spadshchyna-u-3d/.
  16. Marukhovska-Kartunova, O., Rabenchuk, O., Ladonko, L., Bzunko, H., & Petrunia-Pyliavska, N. (2024). Cultural management: Analysis of strategies, policies, and practices in Ukraine and the EU countries. Multidisciplinary Science Journal, 6, article number 2024ss0226. doi: 10.31893/multiscience.2024ss0226.
  17. May, P.M., Schmidt, W., & Vlachopoulos, D. (2020). The use of augmented reality (AR) in museum education: A systematic literature review. In 14th International technology, education and development conference (pp. 3179-3186). Valencia: INTED2020 Proceedings. doi: 10.21125/inted.2020.0917.
  18. Mona Lisa Beyond the Glass: The Louvre’s first virtual reality experience. (2019). Retrieved from https://www.louvre.fr/en/explore/life-at-the-museum/mona-lisa-beyond-the-glass-the-louvre-s-first-virtual-reality-experience?utm_source.
  19. Muenster, S. (2022). Digital 3D technologies for humanities research and education: An overview. Applied Sciences, 12(5), article number 2426. doi: 10.3390/app12052426.
  20. Musiol, H. (2021). Beyond the word: Immersion, art, and theory in environmental and digital humanities prototyping. Retrieved from https://hdl.handle.net/11250/2783968.
  21. National University of “Kyiv-Mohyla Academy” Virtual Museum. (n.d.). Retrieved from https://vm.ukma.edu.ua/en/main-page/.
  22. Neglia, G., Angrisano, M., Mecca, I., & Fabbrocino, F. (2024). Cultural heritage at risk in world conflicts: Digital tools’ contribution to its preservation. Heritage, 7(11), 6343-6365. doi: 10.3390/heritage7110297.
  23. Palmer, C. (2023). Virtual dwelling and the phenomenology of experience: Museum encounters between self and world. Humanities, 12(6), article number 148. doi: 10.3390/h12060148.
  24. Patrucco, G., Bambridge, P., Giulio Tonolo, F., Markey, J., & Spanò, A. (2023). Digital replicas of British museum artefacts. The International Archives of the Photogrammetry, Remote Sensing and Spatial Information Sciences, 48, 1173-1180. doi: 10.5194/isprs-archives-XLVIII-M-2-2023-1173-2023.
  25. Patychuk, B. (2023). Recentralized heritage: The reclamation and reuse of Ukrainian architectural heritage through the metaverse. Retrieved from http://hdl.handle.net/1942/41318.
  26. Pletsan, K., Havryliuk, A., Poberezhets, H., Yurova, T., Bilov, V., & Polotnianko, O. (2023). Digital transformation of preservation and restoration of Ukraine’s cultural heritage. Studies in Media and Communication, 11(7), 376-383. doi: 10.11114/smc.v11i7.6514.
  27. Pouryousefzadeh, S., Akbarzadeh, R., & Pouryousefzadeh, E. (2021). Innovative technologies in revitalizing the cultural heritages in smart cities, opportunities and challenges. In 2021 2nd International conference on smart cities, automation & intelligent computing systems (ICON-SONICS) (pp. 19-24). Piscataway: IEEE.
  28. Reinventing Education. (n.d.). Retrieved from https://openlearning.mit.edu/.
  29. Rodriguez-Garcia, B., Guillen-Sanz, H., Checa, D., & Bustillo, A. (2024). A systematic review of virtual 3D reconstructions of cultural heritage in immersive virtual reality. Multimedia Tools and Applications, 83(42), 89743-89793. doi: 10.1007/s11042-024-18700-3.
  30. Rome Reborn: The Pantheon. (2024). Retrieved from https://www.vrvoyaging.com/rome-reborn-the-pantheon/.
  31. Sachenko, A.О., & Kit, I.R. (2024). The use of augmented reality for renovation of cultural heritage sites. Herald of Advanced Information Technology, 7(1), 24-35. doi: 10.15276/hait.07.2024.2.
  32. Shih, N.J., Chen, H.X., Chen, T.Y., & Qiu, Y.T. (2020). Digital preservation and reconstruction of old cultural elements in augmented reality (AR). Sustainability, 12(21), article number 9262. doi: 10.3390/su12219262.
  33. Site of Palmyra. (2017). Retrieved from https://whc.unesco.org/en/list/23/.
  34. Spallone, R., Lamberti, F., Olivieri, L.M., Ronco, F., & Castagna, L. (2022). AR and VR for enhancing museums’ heritage through 3D reconstruction of fragmented statue and architectural context. The International Archives of the Photogrammetry, Remote Sensing and Spatial Information Sciences, 46, 473-480. doi: 10.5194/isprs-archives-XLVI-2-W1-2022-473-2022.
  35. Trach, Y. (2020). Ukrainian experience of VR-reconstruction of historical and cultural heritage objects. Digital Platform: Information Technologies in Sociocultural Sphere, 3(2), 148-160. doi: 10.31866/2617-796x.3.2.2020.220588.
  36. Trunfio, M., Lucia, M.D., Campana, S., & Magnelli, A. (2022). Innovating the cultural heritage museum service model through virtual reality and augmented reality: The effects on the overall visitor experience and satisfaction. Journal of Heritage Tourism, 17(1), 1-19. doi: 10.1080/1743873X.2020.1850742.
  37. Valli, V., & Carlomagno, N. (2024). Augmented and virtual reality: An innovative approach to learning “digital humanities”. In Innovating Teaching & Learning. Inclusion and Wellbeing for the Data Society (pp. 195-201). Reggio Emilia: Pearson.
  38. Van Nguyen, S., Le, S.T., Tran, M.K., & Tran, H.M. (2022). Reconstruction of 3D digital heritage objects for VR and AR applications. Journal of Information and Telecommunication, 6(3), 254-269. doi: 10.1080/24751839.2021.2008133.
  39. Virtual Human Interactional Lab. (n.d.). Retrieved from https://vhil.stanford.edu/.
  40. Virtual Museum of Syria. (n.d.). Retrieved from https://virtual-museum-syria.org/.
  41. Virtual tourism. (n.d.). Retrieved from https://guide.kyivcity.gov.ua/en.
Suggested citation
Eklsa, I. (2025). Virtual and augmented reality as tools for cultural reconstruction. Journal of Digital Humanities and Cultural Innovation, 1(1), 16-27. https://doi.org/10.67524/verus5/1.2025.16